Thursday 1 October 2015

While the world watches Syria….


Nigerian refugees fleeing Boko Haram attacks, waiting to be registered in Chad.
Photo: UNHCR


No one could have failed to notice the widespread and tragic suffering currently being wreaked on the people of Syria by ongoing conflict between the government, rebels and extremist groups.  The international media has been flooded with photos of men, women and children displaced by the conflict and arriving – traumatised, weary, relieved – on European shores.  As at October 2015 UHNCR has registered more than 4 million Syrian refugees, mostly in neighbouring countries such as Turkey, Lebanon and Jordan.  That figure does not include the more than 7.6 million internally displaced persons still within the country.

There is no doubting the devastating human impact of the Syrian crisis.  The European Commission has described it as the world’s largest humanitarian crisis since World War II.  And no one would question the urgent need for the international community to provide life-saving assistance and access to protection for those displaced.  But while the world watches Syria, what has been happening elsewhere?

Did you know, for example, that violence in the Central African Republic (CAR) has forced almost a million people from their homes and, according to UNHCR, left some 2.7 million people in dire need of aid?  Or that ongoing violence in the region linked to Boko Haram has left more than 2.5 million people in four countries homeless?  On 27th June this year, a single attack on the Nigerian village of Assage Nigeria forced approximately 6,000 people to flee for their lives.   In South Sudan the numbers of displaced have passed 2.6 million, and yet UNHCR’s operations there are currently only 28% funded.

Africa is by no means the only other region affected by violence and displacement, but with numbers like these, why is news of Nigeria, South Sudan and CAR not splashed across our screens?  So-called ‘mega-crises’ such as that currently taking place in Syria can open the eyes of the international community to the plight of those affected by war, conflict and insecurity.  Sometimes that awareness can help to galvanise the community into action.  Tragically, however, that action is not spread evenly across all those who need it.

In Europe, the growing disparity between the treatment of Syrian refugees and those from other countries is being increasingly felt, with workers accusing European governments’ pro-Syrian favouritism of creating a ‘humanitarian caste system’.  In Australia, while the government generously announced plans to resettle some 12,000 Syrians by the end of the year, it continues to lock up most of the rest of the country’s asylum seekers in over-crowded and unsafe detention centres.

The world should open their hearts to Syrians.  But they should also open their hearts to Iraqis, Afghanis, Nigerians, South Sudanese and the many other communities who have had their homes and lives torn apart by violence and disaster.  We cannot applaud our generosity to some while continuing to ignore everyone else. 

Tuesday 14 April 2015

Consulting at Chateau de Bossey


Welcome to Chateau de Bossey.  It's certainly a long way from Africa, but believe it or not I am here as part of my work on African refugee protection.  It is a follow up to my trip to Nairobi last year, where I took part in the Nansen Initiative's Horn of Africa Regional Consultation on disasters, climate change and cross-border displacement.  There I delivered a presentation (and a report) on various African regional legal instruments, including the African Refugee Convention, and discussed when, how and why I think they should be used to protect people who are forced to flee their homes due to drought, flooding and other disasters.  Following the Consultation, I was invited to join the Nansen Initiative's Consultative Committee, a group of representatives from international institutions, NGOs, academia and civil society, whose job it is to support, and provide feedback on, the Nansen Initiative's global consultative process.

If you have a look at their website, you'll see that the aim of the Nansen Initiative is to develop a 'Protection Agenda' for people displaced across borders in the context of natural disasters, including those linked to climate change.  The Nansen Initiative's five Regional Consultations - in the Pacific, Central America, Horn of Africa, South Asia and Southeast Asia - and the Global Consultation (to be held later this year) are all directed towards building consensus among states about how to deal with disaster-related displacement.  Crucially, this includes how people displaced by disasters should be received and treated when they are forced to flee to countries that are not their own.  In general, those displaced by disasters do not qualify for refugee status under the international 1951 Refugee Convention, because they are not at risk of persecution.  In some circumstances, they may be entitled to refugee status under the broader refugee definition of the 1969 African Refugee Convention, which extends refugee protection to people compelled to flee 'events seriously disturbing public order'.  Whether or not natural disasters qualify as such events is contentious (more on that later), but even on the broadest reading of the phrase it will not include all those disasters that force people from their homes.  So the aim of the Protection Agenda is to set out how states think that this protection gap should be addressed.

As you might imagine, coming to such an agreement is a long process.  The aim of the 2-day Consultative Committee workshop, taking place at Chateau de Bossey this week, is to review the progress so far.  The workshop will consider the current draft of the Protection Agenda and discuss issues relating to its content, legal and practice implications, and how to best proceed from here.  For me, it is exciting to be part of it - not only because I get to spend a few days in the most spectacular Swiss countryside, but because I get the opportunity to be part of developing a plan of action that could see more and better protection for literally millions of people worldwide.  The Protection Agenda does not aim to create new law - it won't provide any new international rules on how disaster displaced people should be protected - but if it can consolidate existing ones, and provide a platform for states to improve their responses to this increasingly important issue, then it will be a great step forward.  In the meantime, that Swiss countryside is not going to admire itself.
Chateau de Bossey is near the lovely little village
of Bogis-Bossey, about 20 km from Geneva.

The walk from my room to Reception - I haven't
seen any crapauds yet, but I hope to!

'The Barn', my home for the next few nights.

Looking from the Chateau towards the mountains.

Sigh.....